Single or double spaced?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:02 pm
Should the SOP be single or double spaced? And yes, I want to make sure I make the right decision on this as line spacing will likely be the deciding factor in my application
(This resource is NOT affiliated with gre.org or ets.org)
https://physicsgre.com/
I remember 3 or 4 of the schools I applied to limiting the length to 300-400 words, and strongly advising against going over that limit. So, for a lot of places it's not a question of how is it possible to make yourself clear in 300-400 words, but rather how are you going to do it. Luckily others allowed up to 1000. In the end though, that's what your recommenders are for, if you've got good ones all the limits on the SOP will mean very little because they can tell your story in a way the reviewers will best understand, relate to, and appreciate.mrrsnhtl wrote:For double-spaced case, it took nearly two pages for 500 words. Mine is around 1000-1100 words and 1.0 - spaced. It took little less than two pages. Are there any people who make themselves clear with 300-500 words? I would award them the admission just for this success, if I were in the admission committee.
Writing guidelines have been revised many times since typewriters died out and they still stick to it for a reason. It is a neater and cleaner look, and I've never seen a true 2.0 look obnoxiously sparse since it contains the same words in either case. I'd rather have a few hundred words come out to two pages double-spaced than have it all jammed into one page. It fools nobody, better to not aggravate them through the subtle nuances of formatting.Ymerodraeth wrote:I single spaced mine and was able to get it onto one page (~1000 words).
As far as readability, there's something to be said for a little bit of extra spacing, say by a factor of 1.2 or 1.3. A true double spacing (2.0) makes your text obnoxiously sparse. As far as I can tell, it's just a holdover from the typewriter days.
This, I have difficulties to comprehend. To me, it is over-competitiveness, or simply saying "Bring no excuses, just state your excellences and satisfy my eyes, if you can though..".midwestphysics wrote:...I remember 3 or 4 of the schools I applied to limiting the length to 300-400 words, and strongly advising against going over that limit. So, for a lot of places it's not a question of how is it possible to make yourself clear in 300-400 words, but rather how are you going to do it...
From what I've heard from professors a strong rational behind strict limitations are what those limitations reveal. These schools are looking for very specific people with specific qualities. By placing a strict limit applicants are forced to cut out all the crap these schools don't care about. What is left in that space is what is important. It shows them what you consider to be important, enough so to have it supersede all of the other stuff you could have put in. It also shows if you match up with not only their requirements, goals, and desired experience, but also in your priorities. It's smart to not let people write all they want, it's harder to bullshit in 300-500 words than it is in 1000-2000. It's not an in-depth biography, it's an interview and like any interview you have to condense yourself.mrrsnhtl wrote:This, I have difficulties to comprehend. To me, it is over-competitiveness, or simply saying "Bring no excuses, just state your excellences and satisfy my eyes, if you can though..".midwestphysics wrote:...I remember 3 or 4 of the schools I applied to limiting the length to 300-400 words, and strongly advising against going over that limit. So, for a lot of places it's not a question of how is it possible to make yourself clear in 300-400 words, but rather how are you going to do it...
Seriously, what is wrong with letting people to express themselves in as many words as they want. Obviously, mean page number would be roughly around 1.6-1.7 order, with a sigma of ~ .5 ..Saying "do not exceed 2 pages" is quite reasonable for this model, as most schools do. I wonder what those perfectionist schools were?..
You are right. Yet, this doesn't change the nonsense conditions created by hard competition, which expects always the "best" with always the most specific "qualities" of all?..What about the "Imagination is more important than the knowledge" soul. Is it also long gone with the winds of the capitalism? (=midwestphysics wrote:From what I've heard from professors a strong rational behind strict limitations are what those limitations reveal. These schools are looking for very specific people with specific qualities. By placing a strict limit applicants are forced to cut out all the crap these schools don't care about. What is left in that space is what is important. It shows them what you consider to be important, enough so to have it supersede all of the other stuff you could have put in. It also shows if you match up with not only their requirements, goals, and desired experience, but also in your priorities. It's smart to not let people write all they want, it's harder to bullshit in 300-500 words than it is in 1000-2000. It's not an in-depth biography, it's an interview and like any interview you have to condense yourself.mrrsnhtl wrote:This, I have difficulties to comprehend. To me, it is over-competitiveness, or simply saying "Bring no excuses, just state your excellences and satisfy my eyes, if you can though..".midwestphysics wrote:...I remember 3 or 4 of the schools I applied to limiting the length to 300-400 words, and strongly advising against going over that limit. So, for a lot of places it's not a question of how is it possible to make yourself clear in 300-400 words, but rather how are you going to do it...
Seriously, what is wrong with letting people to express themselves in as many words as they want. Obviously, mean page number would be roughly around 1.6-1.7 order, with a sigma of ~ .5 ..Saying "do not exceed 2 pages" is quite reasonable for this model, as most schools do. I wonder what those perfectionist schools were?..