Hello all,
I'm retaking the test in the coming November. I had studied E&M from HRW very thoroughly(almost three times by now). So I was thinking whether I should turn to Griffiths for E&M, as I want to do really well the next time. Is it worth or should I just revise it from HRW.?
I'm using the following books:
QM by Griffiths
Modern Physics by Beiser
HRW
Plz comment..
Thank you.
E&M--Griffiths vs HRW
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:14 am
Re: E&M--Griffiths vs HRW
Image charge method and EM waves are not treated in HRW. so you have to do them, since they are very important from PGRE POV, so I would recommend Griffiths for them.satyad18 wrote:Hello all,
I'm retaking the test in the coming November. I had studied E&M from HRW very thoroughly(almost three times by now). So I was thinking whether I should turn to Griffiths for E&M, as I want to do really well the next time. Is it worth or should I just revise it from HRW.?
I'm using the following books:
QM by Griffiths
Modern Physics by Beiser
HRW
Plz comment..
Thank you.
Re: E&M--Griffiths vs HRW
Ok. And I already have a book on E&M by Hayt and Buck. I found it to be good. Hmm..or may be I should try out Griffiths!
Thanks.
Thanks.