Master Theory (edition 2)

  • Imagine you are sipping tea or coffee while discussing various issues with a broad and diverse network of students, colleagues, and friends brought together by the common bond of physics, graduate school, and the physics GRE.

Masterov
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:23 am

Master Theory (edition 2)

Postby Masterov » Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:29 am

1. Master Theory - relativistic theory, because it is the same problem ("Electrodynamics of moving material bodies"), which solved the Einstein.

2. In Master Theory time is absolutely (absent "Twin Paradox"), than it differs from Einstein's Special Relativity Theory (SRT). A transverse (to the direction of motion) scale in Einstein's theory are absolute . But this difference has profound implications. (For example: in Master Theory are absent "Twin Paradox" and "Ehrenfest's Paradox".)

3. Author of Master Theory (Alexander V. Masterov) has proved that the problem (that are solved by Einstein) has an infinite number of solutions. SRT - only one of this infinite number of solutions.

Where did these solutions?

The longitudinal scales of SRT (along the direction of motion) are relative and depends on the relative velocity, whereas (by default) are the absolute transverse (to the direction of motion) scales. The author of Master Theory are assume a regarding of the transverse scope, that let has at its disposal a free parameter. For each value this parameter to can build a individual Theory of Relativity. This theory will be equal footing with Einstein's theory.
Among this infinite number of theories discovered one in which time is absolute. The author named it - "Master Theory".

4. As Master Theory is a solution of the same problem (that Einstein's theory), then all the experimental results that confirm SRT - confirmed by Master Theory. The exception is fact of relativistic dilation time, which today has not been experimentally proved.

5. In Master Theory to exist absoluteness of:
. light's speed;
b. acceleration (which can be measured indirectly through a mass attached to a spring, for example);
c. number Image (absent "Ehrenfest's Paradox");


6. Master Theory (as against SRT) is valid in all reference frames (not only in inertial).

7. In Master Theory identified two types of coordinates: real and visual:
a. real-coordinates obey the Galilean Transformations, and can be calculated by integrating an acceleration;
b. visual-coordinates determined by the properties of EMF and can be calculated from a real-coordinates;
c. in Master Theory defined the inverse transformations coordinates (from a visual-coordinates to a real-coordinates).
Last edited by Masterov on Thu Aug 18, 2011 11:53 am, edited 2 times in total.

Masterov
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:23 am

Re: Master Theory (edition 2)

Postby Masterov » Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:31 am

Master Theory (edition 2)
Consider a light clock with a pair of vertical mirrors (one on our left, the other - on the right) and a beam of photons between them:
Image

Image - distance between the mirrors

Image

Image - period of the clock:

Now let the observer move with a speed (right to left and back) (Image). The clock (in observer's frame) will move as follows:

Image

Oscillogram:

Image

Because the speed of light in all a inertial reference frames (IRF) is invariable, then (from the viewpoint of an observer) time of flight of the photon beam from mirror to mirror in different directions will be different, inasmuch as moving in one direction - move opposite to the mirror (flight time is lesser),   moving in the opposite direction - will in pursuit of mirror (flight time is bigger). Total time (there and back) are changing:

Image


How can this be?
This is so indeed: the clock nothing to do with the observer do not have. Any properties of the clock can not depend of acrobatic exercises of the observer. Conclusion: a visual-distance between the mirrors changes:
Image

Consequently:
Image

______________________________________________

The longitudinal scale is clear. We proceed to investigate the cross-scale. For this we consider the light clock with a pair of horizontal mirrors (one - from the bottom, the other - from the top):

Image

Again: Image and the observer move.

Image

Oscillogram:

Image

Light will travel long distances over the same time. But light can not move faster "light's speed". Again we change a visual-distance between the mirrors changes:

Image


From the Pythagorean theorem follows:

Image

next:

Image


--------------------------------------------------------


Compare:

MasterTheory:
Image


SRT:
Image


All theories:
Image

For Image a result is Einstein's Theory of Relativity.

For Image a result is Master Theory.

For each of the intermediate values (Image) we can construct theories have, and each of the which (infinitely many) will have as much right to exist as the SRT. But only in the case - time is absolutely, therefore only Master Theory can claim the right to approximate the property of space and time. All other theories (including SRT) - false.

Masterov
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:23 am

Re: Master Theory (edition 2)

Postby Masterov » Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:32 am

Coordinate transformation of Master Theory

In Master Theory acceleration is an absolute for all IRF (measured by a spring with a small mass, for example). By Integrating the acceleration we can calculate the actual speed (relative to the initial velocity):

Image


By integrating the velocity we can calculate the real-coordinates (relative to the initial coordinates):

Image

Given the expression:

Image

we can obtain the dependence of the real-speed from the visual-speed:

Image

and the visual-speed from the real-speed:

Image

Consequently, the visual-coordinates are computed as follows:

Image

here Image - the visual-time. (And in general: all of the visual position and time followed simbol ', with the exception of speed. Ie: Image.) '._.:

Image

The real-coordinates are computed through the visual-coordinates as follows:
Image



We make the real-time's derivative of the visual-time:

Image

This formula is describes the Doppler's effect which come out from the finite speed of propagation of electromagnetic wave. This formula implies that the visual-coordinates to make sense until the real-speed at which the observed object is deleted, does not exceed the speed of light. Objects, the actual velocity of which (relative to the observer) is equal to or greater than the light's speed is a beam of neutrinos and not interact with slow matter.

Masterov
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:23 am

Re: Master Theory (edition 2)

Postby Masterov » Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:05 pm

Quark Relativistic Maxwell

Since any differential operator is local (in close proximity), and (consequently) a finiteness of a propagation speed of the fields (in infinitely small distance) can not make adjustments to the equation. Therefore, Maxwell's equations in differential form in the context of the Master Theory would not be changed in comparison with the classics. Namely:

Image

But integral Maxwell (because of a nonlocality of a integral operators) will have a fundamentally different (non-classical, but - relativistic) form. This is explained by the fact that Stokes' and Gauss' theorems:

Image

and

Image

valid only for stationary fields, or fields, the speed of which is infinite. Application of these theorems (for the output of the integral form of Maxwell's equations) can not be correct in the relativistic case.

Masterov
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:23 am

Re: Master Theory (edition 2)

Postby Masterov » Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:24 pm

I came to the forum not in order to my a knowledges demonstrate, but in order to get answers to questions.
I'm looking for a professional who understands the relativism and can answer the question: Einstein bestowed the absoluteness to the cross-scale (but not for time) - on what basis?

Einstein had entitled (bestowed the absoluteness to time), but no did it.

Why?




Return to “Physics Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest