The mad CERN ’s project.

  • Imagine you are sipping tea or coffee while discussing various issues with a broad and diverse network of students, colleagues, and friends brought together by the common bond of physics, graduate school, and the physics GRE.

socratus
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 6:17 am

The mad CERN ’s project.

Postby socratus » Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:07 am

The mad CERN ’s project.
=== .
In 1906, Rutherford studied internal structure of atoms,
bombarding them with high energy a- particles.
This idea helped him understand the structure of atom.
But the clever Devil interfered and gave advice to physicists
to enlarge the target. Bomb them!
And physicist created huge cannon-accelerators of particles.
And they began to bomb micro particles in the vacuum, in hoping
to understand their inner structure. And they were surprised with
the results of this bombing. Several hundreds of completely new
strange particles appeared. They lived a very little time and do not
relate to our world. Our Earth needs its real constants of nature.
But this was forgotten.
What God carefully created, is destroyed in accelerators.
And they are proud of that. They say: we study the inner structure
of the particles. The clever and artful Devil is glad. He again has deceived man.
Physicist think, that an accelerator - is first of all the presence of huge energy.
And the Devil laughs. He knows, that an accelerator - is first of all the Vacuum.
But this, he has withheld from man.
He has not explained that the Vacuum is infinite and inexhaustible.
And in infinity there is contained an infinite variety of particles.
And by bombing the vacuum, one can find centaurs and sphinxes.
But my God, save us from their presence on Earth.
========= .. ========.
Rutherford was right.
His followers are mistaken.
Why?
Imagine, that I want to plant a small apple- tree.
For this purpose I shall dig out a hole of 1 meter width and 1,20 m depth.
It is normal.
But if to plant a small apple- tree, I shall begin to dig
a base for a huge building (skyscraper),
or if to begin drill ground with 10 km. depth,
will you call me a normal man?
========== .. ===============.
Imagine a man who breaks watches on the wall.
And then he tries to understand the mechanism of the watches
by thrown cogwheels, springs and small screws.
Does he have many chances to succeed?
As many as the scientists have who aspire to understand
the inner structure of electron by breaking them into accelerators.
If not take into account the initial conditions of Genesis,
the fantasies of the scientists may be unlimited.
========== . ======== .
The Nature works very economical.
For example, biologists know 100 ( hundred ) kinds of
amino acids. But only 20 ( twenty) kinds of amino acids
are suitable to produce molecules of protein, from which all
different cells created on our planet. What are about another
80 % of amino acids? They are dead end of evolution.
The physicists found many ( 1000 ) new elementary particles in
accelerators. But we need only one ( 1) electron and one (1 )
proton to create first atom, to begin to create the Nature.
All another elementary particles (mesons, muons , bosons, taus,
all their girlfriends - antiparticles, all quarks and antiquarks…etc)
are dead end of evolution.
============.
What was before - “ the big bang” or the vacuum ?
The physicists created “ Europe’s Large Hadron Colider “
Please, look at how our physicists made this accelerator.
They made the vacuum and after they generated a big reaction
between two colliding particles in some small imitation of the
“big bang”. They didn’t make this process in the reverse.
So, what was prior in the Universe: “ big bang” or vacuum?
===========================..
The Universe as whole is Vacuum, first of all.
=== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
=========================.

schwiss
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:49 am

Re: The mad CERN ’s project.

Postby schwiss » Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:55 am

I don't know what you are smoking, but I want some of that.

User avatar
twistor
Posts: 1531
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:47 pm

Re: The mad CERN ’s project.

Postby twistor » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:04 pm

All another elementary particles (mesons, muons , bosons, taus,
all their girlfriends - antiparticles, all quarks and antiquarks…etc)
are dead end of evolution.


A comprehensive theory of the "male-ness" and "female-ness" of all particles would help eliminate confusion among physicists and to what particles it is acceptable to date. Please publish your theory!

axiomofchoice
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:45 pm

Re: The mad CERN ’s project.

Postby axiomofchoice » Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:10 pm

twistor wrote:A comprehensive theory of the "male-ness" and "female-ness" of all particles would help eliminate confusion among physicists and to what particles it is acceptable to date. Please publish your theory!


Wait.... do you mean that those particle physicist interested in pair production of (you name it, top-antitop, etc.) are involved in a love triangle? :shock:

User avatar
twistor
Posts: 1531
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:47 pm

Re: The mad CERN ’s project.

Postby twistor » Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:38 pm

axiomofchoice wrote:
twistor wrote:A comprehensive theory of the "male-ness" and "female-ness" of all particles would help eliminate confusion among physicists and to what particles it is acceptable to date. Please publish your theory!


Wait.... do you mean that those particle physicist interested in pair production of (you name it, top-antitop, etc.) are involved in a love triangle? :shock:


I don't approve of physicists breaking up pair bonding.

The_Duck
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:04 pm

Re: The mad CERN ’s project.

Postby The_Duck » Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:26 am

socratus wrote:by bombing the vacuum, one can find centaurs and sphinxes.


Of all the potential new physics at the LHC, I think this possibility has to be the most exciting.




Return to “Physics Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest